Poco C65 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $99 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 33/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 348,562); the Poco C65 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C65
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Poco C65 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $2899
- Better portability (63/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1031
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 36 points higher (69/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Poco C65 — 56/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (90/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C65 (70/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C65 (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C65 (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (63/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C65 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 348562 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $99 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C65 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Poco C65 by 88.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2800. Poco C65 was $2800 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (90/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C65 (70/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C65 (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C65 (63/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (63/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 36 points (69/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.