Nokia G400 vs Poco C65
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 33/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Nokia G400 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 346,495).
Nokia G400
Poco C65
- Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 1031
- Faster charging: 20W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 43/100)
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 192g vs 198g
- Better portability (63/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Poco C65, the Nokia G400 scores 10 points higher (43/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 leads (41/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (41/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 346495 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1031 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $99 |
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G400 and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G400 leads Poco C65 by 37.8% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia G400
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (41/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (66/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Poco C65?
The Nokia G400 is noticeably better than the Poco C65 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Poco C65?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Poco C65 — 33/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Poco C65?
The Nokia G400 leads on performance (41/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Poco C65?
The Nokia G400 is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use.