Nokia G400 vs Poco C65
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G400 leads — 43/100 vs 33/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Nokia G400 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 348,562).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia G400
Poco C65
What makes Nokia G400 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 1031
- Faster charging: 20W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Poco C65 better?
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 192g vs 198g
- Better portability (63/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Poco C65, the Nokia G400 scores 10 points higher (43/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 leads (41/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (41/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 348562 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1031 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $99 |
Camera comparison
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia G400 and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G400 leads Poco C65 by 37.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia G400
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (41/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G400 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (66/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Poco C65?
The Nokia G400 is noticeably better than the Poco C65 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Poco C65?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Poco C65 — 33/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G400 or the Poco C65?
The Nokia G400 leads on performance (41/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Poco C65?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Nokia G400 (66/100 vs 43/100).