Poco C65 vs Vivo Y27 (2023)

The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo Y27 (2023) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y27 (2023) leads — 38/100 vs 33/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y27 (2023) doesn't.

The Vivo Y27 (2023) edges out the Poco C65 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco C65

Performance 25
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 63
Value for money 56

Vivo Y27 (2023)

Performance 29
Display 57
Camera 30
Battery 48
Portability 63
Value for money —

What makes Poco C65 better?


  • Overall rating 33/100

What makes Vivo Y27 (2023) better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 419 vs 375
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1461 vs 1031
  • Faster charging: 44W vs 18W
  • Lighter: 190g vs 192g

  • Higher performance (29/100 vs 25/100)
  • Longer battery life (48/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (57/100 vs 43/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Vivo Y27 (2023), the Vivo Y27 (2023) scores 5 points higher (38/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y27 (2023) and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (29/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y27 (2023) is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y27 (2023) is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco C65 Vivo Y27 (2023)
Processor MediaTek Helio G85 MediaTek Helio G85
AnTuTu 348562 348562
Geekbench Single 375 419
Geekbench Multi 1031 1461
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 1600x720 1080x2388
Refresh rate 90 Hz —
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 44W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 8 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 6GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB
OS Android 13 / HyperOS Android 13, Funtouch 13
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 600 nits
NFC yes no
Dimensions 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm 164.1×76.2×8.1 mm
Weight 192 g 190 g
Launch price $99 —

Camera comparison

Poco C65

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo Y27 (2023)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Poco C65

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Vivo Y27 (2023)

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2388
  • Refresh rate: —
57
display

Battery and charging

Poco C65

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Vivo Y27 (2023)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco C65 and Vivo Y27 (2023), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C65 MediaTek Helio G85
33/100
348562 AnTuTu
Vivo Y27 (2023) MediaTek Helio G85
38/100
348562 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco C65

$99

Vivo Y27 (2023)

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y27 (2023) and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (29/100 vs 25/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo Y27 (2023) is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y27 (2023) is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Vivo Y27 (2023)?

The Vivo Y27 (2023) edges out the Poco C65 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Vivo Y27 (2023)?

The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo Y27 (2023) — 38/100.

Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Vivo Y27 (2023)?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Vivo Y27 (2023) (57/100 vs 43/100).