Nokia X30 vs Poco C65
The Nokia X30 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C65 leads — 25/100 vs 23/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C65 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4200); the Nokia X30 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 262,000).
Nokia X30
Poco C65
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 262000
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2003 vs 1031
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Lighter: 185g vs 192g
- Better camera (33/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 60/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4200 mAh
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Nokia X30 vs the Poco C65, the Poco C65 scores 2 points higher (25/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 leads (36/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (33/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (36/100 vs 20/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Nokia X30 | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 262000 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 1031 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 700 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.9×73.9×8.0 mm | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 192 g | |
| Price | — | $99 |
Nokia X30
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia X30
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia X30
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia X30 and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia X30 leads Poco C65 by 126.0% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia X30
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (33/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Nokia X30 (36/100 vs 20/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia X30 (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Nokia X30 or the Poco C65?
The Poco C65 edges out the Nokia X30 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia X30 and the Poco C65?
The Nokia X30 has a MobileRank rating of 23/100, the Poco C65 — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia X30 or the Poco C65?
The Nokia X30 leads on camera score (33/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Nokia X30 over the Poco C65?
The Nokia X30 is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.