Nokia G60 vs Poco C65
The Nokia G60 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85; estimated prices are $329 and $99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G60 leads — 29/100 vs 25/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C65 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Nokia G60 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 262,000).
Nokia G60
Poco C65
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 262000
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2003 vs 1031
- Faster charging: 20W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 190g vs 192g
- Better camera (26/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 60/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Cheaper: $99 vs $329
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 24/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 87/100)
Comparing the Nokia G60 vs the Poco C65, the Nokia G60 scores 4 points higher (29/100 vs 25/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 leads (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 leads (100/100 vs 87/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Nokia G60 significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G60 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (26/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia G60 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (62/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (100/100 vs 87/100).
| Specification | Nokia G60 | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 262000 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 1031 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×75.9×8.6 mm | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 192 g | |
| Price | $329 | $99 |
Nokia G60
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia G60
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia G60
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G60 and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G60 leads Poco C65 by 126.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $230. Poco C65 is cheaper by $230.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G60 significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G60 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (26/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia G60 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (62/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (100/100 vs 87/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G60 or the Poco C65?
The Nokia G60 edges out the Poco C65 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G60 and the Poco C65?
The Nokia G60 has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the Poco C65 — 25/100.
Should you choose the Nokia G60 over the Poco C65?
The Nokia G60 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.