Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs Poco C65

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C65 leads — 25/100 vs 18/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C65 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is faster in AnTuTu (597,974 vs 262,000); the Poco C65 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 230g).

The Poco C65 edges out the Nokia 8 V 5G UW by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 45
Battery 24
Design 12
Value for money 55
Poco C65
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 24
Battery 36
Design 60
Value for money 100
What makes Nokia 8 V 5G UW better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 597974 vs 262000
  • Better Geekbench Single: 799 vs 375
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1836 vs 1031
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (45/100 vs 24/100)
What makes Poco C65 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Lighter: 192g vs 230g

  • Longer battery life (36/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the Poco C65, the Poco C65 scores 7 points higher (25/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (45/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 leads (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Poco C65 (45/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (60/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 55/100).

Nokia 8 V 5G UW: The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use.
Poco C65: The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia 8 V 5G UW Poco C65
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G MediaTek Helio G85
AnTuTu 597974 262000
Geekbench Single 799 375
Geekbench Multi 1836 1031
Display 6.0" IPS LCD 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 1600x720
Refresh rate 90 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 18W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 0 MP
Front camera 24 MP 8 MP
RAM 6GB 4GB / 6GB
Storage 64GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 10 Android 13 / HyperOS
Brightness (peak) 600 nits
NFC yes yes
Dimensions 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm
Weight 230 g 192 g
Price $99
Camera comparison
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 24MP
45
camera
Poco C65
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
24
camera
Display comparison
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • 6.0" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Poco C65
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
24
battery
Poco C65
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
36
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia 8 V 5G UW and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia 8 V 5G UW Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
18/100
597974 AnTuTu
Poco C65 MediaTek Helio G85
25/100 -128.2%
262000 AnTuTu

Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads Poco C65 by 128.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
Price unknown
Poco C65
$99
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (50/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW notably outperforms the Poco C65 (45/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (36/100 vs 24/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (60/100 vs 12/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco C65 significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (100/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Poco C65?

The Poco C65 edges out the Nokia 8 V 5G UW by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the Poco C65?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Poco C65 — 25/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the Poco C65?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on camera score (45/100 vs 24/100).

Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the Poco C65?

The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco C65 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.