Nokia XR30 vs Poco C65
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia XR30 leads — 46/100 vs 33/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C65 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Nokia XR30 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 346,495).
Nokia XR30
Poco C65
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2003 vs 1031
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (46/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the Poco C65, the Nokia XR30 scores 13 points higher (46/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (46/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (46/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 346495 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 1031 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | 192 g | |
| Launch price | — | $99 |
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia XR30 and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia XR30 leads Poco C65 by 70.9% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia XR30
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (46/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (66/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the Poco C65?
The Nokia XR30 is noticeably better than the Poco C65 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the Poco C65?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Poco C65 — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the Poco C65?
The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the Poco C65?
The Nokia XR30 leads on performance (46/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the Poco C65?
The Nokia XR30 is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use.