Poco C65 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $99 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 33/100 (a 58-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 348,562); the Poco C65 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C65
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Poco C65 better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $950
- Better portability (63/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1031
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 58 points higher (91/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Poco C65 — 56/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (99/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C65 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 348562 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $99 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C65 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco C65 by 91.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $851. Poco C65 was $851 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (99/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (89/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (85/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 58 points (91/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.