Poco F7 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $499 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 67/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,301,212); the Poco F7 Pro is noticeably lighter (206g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F7 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
- Lighter: 206g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $950
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2301212
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6511
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 65/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F7 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 24 points higher (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Poco F7 Pro — 56/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (85/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F7 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2301212 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 206 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $499 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F7 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco F7 Pro by 45.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $451. Poco F7 Pro was $451 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (99/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (96/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (85/100 vs 65/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F7 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.