Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $950 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 87/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,942,923).
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3942923
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 98/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 87/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 83/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 224g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $892 vs $950
- Better portability (42/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 4 points higher (91/100 vs 87/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (99/100 vs 98/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | $892 |
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) by 7.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $58. Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) was $58 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (99/100 vs 98/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 87/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.