Vivo X500 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Vivo X500 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $820 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 leads — 89/100 vs 87/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6800); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 3,930,719).

The Vivo X500 edges out the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo X500

Performance 96
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 84
Portability 50
Value for money 92

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Vivo X500 better?

  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6800 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 211g vs 224g
  • Cheaper at launch: $820 vs $892

  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (50/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 3930719
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3302
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10240
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 96/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X500 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Vivo X500 scores 2 points higher (89/100 vs 87/100). Value score: Vivo X500 — 92/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X500 are nearly equal (98/100 vs 96/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 87/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).

Vivo X500: The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo X500 Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9600M Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3930719 3950082
Geekbench Single 3302 3639
Geekbench Multi 10240 11047
Display 6.6" AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2750 1200x2608
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7500 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 90W 90W
Wireless charging 40W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 17 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 157.0×75.0×8.2 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 211 g 224 g
Launch price $820 $892

Camera comparison

Vivo X500

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Vivo X500

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2750
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Vivo X500

  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
84
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X500 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X500 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
89/100
3930719 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +0.5%
3950082 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo X500 by 0.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo X500

$820

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Launch price difference: $72. Vivo X500 was $72 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X500 are nearly equal (98/100 vs 96/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 87/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (50/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo X500 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo X500 edges out the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Vivo X500 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo X500 has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Should you choose the Vivo X500 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.