Vivo iQOO 15T vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $499 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 82/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (4,704,310 vs 3,950,082).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) edges out the Vivo iQOO 15T by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO 15T

Performance 97
Display 99
Camera 65
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 86

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4704310 vs 3950082
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 216g vs 224g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $892

  • Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (44/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3293
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10243

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 97/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 65/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 75/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO 15T vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 5 points higher (87/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO 15T — 86/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo iQOO 15T are nearly equal (98/100 vs 97/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (87/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (44/100 vs 42/100).

Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO 15T Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 4704310 3950082
Geekbench Single 3293 3639
Geekbench Multi 10243 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168 1200x2608
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 8000 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 100W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions — 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 216 g 224 g
Launch price $499 $892

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
65
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO 15T

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO 15T and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100
4704310 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 -19.1%
3950082 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15T leads Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) by 19.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO 15T

$499

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Launch price difference: $393. Vivo iQOO 15T was $393 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo iQOO 15T are nearly equal (98/100 vs 97/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (99/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (87/100 vs 65/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 75/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (44/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 15T or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) edges out the Vivo iQOO 15T by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 15T and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo iQOO 15T has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 15T or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 65/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 15T over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.