Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $950 and $825. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 86/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6300); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,569,354); the Xiaomi 17 Pro is noticeably lighter (192g vs 230g).
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3569354
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3310
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 10070
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6300 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 95/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 192g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $825 vs $950
- Better portability (64/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 5 points higher (91/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 3569354 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3310 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 10070 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 2656x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6300 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 151.1×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 192 g | |
| Price | $950 | $825 |
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2656x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- 6300 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 17 Pro by 19.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $125. Xiaomi 17 Pro is cheaper by $125.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro (96/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 17 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.