Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $950 and $825. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 86/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6300); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,569,354); the Xiaomi 17 Pro is noticeably lighter (192g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Pro
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3569354
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3310
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10070
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6300 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 95/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 192g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $825 vs $950
- Better portability (64/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 5 points higher (91/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 81/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 17 Pro — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 3569354 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3310 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 10070 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 2656x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6300 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 151.1×71.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | $825 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2656x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Pro
- 6300 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 17 Pro by 19.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $125. Xiaomi 17 Pro was $125 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (99/100 vs 95/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro (96/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (64/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 17 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.