Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $950 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 89/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,600,724); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 166).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3600724
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $999
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 97/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 93/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 226g vs 230g
- Better portability (40/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 2 points higher (91/100 vs 89/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (99/100 vs 97/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 93/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 3600724 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | 166 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 17 Ultra by 18.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $49. Vivo X300 Ultra was $49 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (99/100 vs 97/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 93/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (40/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 17 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.