Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $950 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 87/100 vs 84/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 3,998,145); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 159).
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 3998145
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper: $950 vs $999
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 87/100)
- Better value for money (44/100 vs 41/100)
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 7000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 2160Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 219g vs 230g
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 77/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (26/100 vs 12/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 3 points higher (87/100 vs 84/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (82/100 vs 77/100). In the "design" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (26/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (44/100 vs 41/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 3998145 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 2160 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | 159 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 219 g | |
| Price | $950 | $999 |
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 2160 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 7500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 17 Pro Max by 6.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $49. Vivo X300 Ultra is cheaper by $49.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 87/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (82/100 vs 77/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (26/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (44/100 vs 41/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 87/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.