Poco F7 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $399 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 66/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,199,079); the Poco F7 is noticeably lighter (215g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F7
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Poco F7 better?
- Lighter: 215g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $950
- Better portability (48/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2199079
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2072
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6649
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 80/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F7 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 25 points higher (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Poco F7 — 60/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 (85/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F7 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2199079 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2072 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6649 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F7 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco F7 by 48.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $551. Poco F7 was $551 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 (99/100 vs 80/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (96/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 (85/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F7 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 by 25 points (91/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F7 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F7 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 80/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.