Poco F7 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $500 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 82/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,932,885); the Poco F7 Ultra is noticeably lighter (212g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Poco F7 Ultra by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco F7 Ultra

Performance 90
Display 90
Camera 71
Battery 84
Portability 48
Value for money 86

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?

  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 212g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $950

  • Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (48/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2932885
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5300 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 71/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 84/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco F7 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 9 points higher (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 71/100). Value score: Poco F7 Ultra — 86/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (96/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Poco F7 Ultra are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).

Poco F7 Ultra: The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco F7 Ultra Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2932885 4247433
Geekbench Single 3013 3639
Geekbench Multi 9287 11047
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 3200x1440 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5300 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 120W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 32 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 212 g 230 g
Launch price $500 $950

Camera comparison

Poco F7 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
71
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Poco F7 Ultra

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Poco F7 Ultra

  • 5300 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco F7 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco F7 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
82/100
2932885 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +30.9%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Poco F7 Ultra by 30.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco F7 Ultra

$500

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $450. Poco F7 Ultra was $450 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (96/100 vs 71/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Poco F7 Ultra are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco F7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Poco F7 Ultra by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Poco F7 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 71/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 90/100).

Should you choose the Poco F7 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.