Poco C65 vs Vivo X500 Pro

The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $99 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 33/100 (a 57-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 348,562).

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 57 points (90/100 vs 33/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco C65

Performance 25
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 63
Value for money 56

Vivo X500 Pro

Performance 100
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 81
Portability 63
Value for money 92

What makes Poco C65 better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $970

  • Overall rating 33/100

What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 348562
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 375
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 1031
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 43/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 57 points higher (90/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Poco C65 — 56/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (100/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100.

Vivo X500 Pro: The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco C65 Vivo X500 Pro
Processor MediaTek Helio G85 MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
AnTuTu 348562 5016623
Geekbench Single 375 4188
Geekbench Multi 1031 13145
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1600x720 1216x2660
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 18W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 8 MP 50 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 / HyperOS Android 17
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68/IP69
Dimensions 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm
Weight 192 g 192 g
Launch price $99 $970

Camera comparison

Poco C65

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo X500 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Poco C65

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2660
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Poco C65

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Vivo X500 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco C65 and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C65 MediaTek Helio G85
33/100
348562 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro
90/100 +93.1%
5016623 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 Pro leads Poco C65 by 93.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco C65

$99

Vivo X500 Pro

$970

Launch price difference: $871. Poco C65 was $871 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (100/100 vs 25/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (94/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (87/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (81/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 57 points (90/100 vs 33/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 25/100).

Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Vivo X500 Pro?

The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.