Poco F7 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $500 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Ultra leads — 82/100 vs 69/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,060,993 vs 2,926,532); the Poco F7 Ultra is noticeably lighter (212g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F7 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Poco F7 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3060993 vs 2926532
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 212g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $2899
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (71/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5300 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F7 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 13 points higher (82/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (71/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Poco F7 Ultra — 86/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (48/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3060993 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $500 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Poco F7 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Poco F7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F7 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F7 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 4.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2399. Poco F7 Ultra was $2399 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (71/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (48/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F7 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Poco F7 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F7 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F7 Ultra leads on camera score (71/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.