Poco F8 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco F8 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $529 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Pro leads — 79/100 vs 69/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Pro has the bigger battery (6210 mAh vs 5600); the Poco F8 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,024,818 vs 2,926,532); the Poco F8 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F8 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Poco F8 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3024818 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 6210 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $529 vs $2899
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (70/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F8 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Poco F8 Pro scores 10 points higher (79/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Pro leads (70/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Poco F8 Pro — 78/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3024818 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6210 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.3×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $529 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Poco F8 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.65
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Poco F8 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F8 Pro
- 6210 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:55 hrs, total 30:03 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F8 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F8 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 3.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2370. Poco F8 Pro was $2370 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Poco F8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Pro leads on camera score (70/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Poco F8 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.