Poco F8 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco F8 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $529 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Pro leads — 71/100 vs 57/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Pro has the bigger battery (6210 mAh vs 5600); the Poco F8 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,033,306 vs 2,926,532); the Poco F8 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Poco F8 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3033306 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 6210 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $529 vs $2899
- Higher performance (68/100 vs 67/100)
- Better camera (68/100 vs 49/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (73/100 vs 0/100)
- Overall rating 57/100
Comparing the Poco F8 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Poco F8 Pro scores 14 points higher (71/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Pro leads (68/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 Pro leads (73/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (68/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "design" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (73/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Poco F8 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3033306 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6210 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.3×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $529 | $2899 |
Poco F8 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.65
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Poco F8 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F8 Pro
- 6210 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:55 hrs, total 30:03 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Poco F8 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F8 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 3.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2370. Poco F8 Pro is cheaper by $2370.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (68/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (68/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (73/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Poco F8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Poco F8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Pro leads on camera score (68/100 vs 49/100).
Should you choose the Poco F8 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.