Poco F8 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

The Poco F8 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $529 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 79/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Pro has the bigger battery (6210 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,463,142 vs 3,024,818); the Poco F8 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 214g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra edges out the Poco F8 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco F8 Pro

Performance 91
Display 83
Camera 70
Battery 68
Portability 60
Value for money 78

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 78

What makes Poco F8 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 6210 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 60W
  • Lighter: 199g vs 214g
  • Cheaper at launch: $529 vs $1299

  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better portability (60/100 vs 51/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3463142 vs 3024818
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 9287

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco F8 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 5 points higher (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 70/100). Value score: Poco F8 Pro — 78/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F8 Pro (86/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F8 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).

Poco F8 Pro: The Poco F8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco F8 Pro Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3024818 3463142
Geekbench Single 3013 3601
Geekbench Multi 9287 10686
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2712x1220 3120x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6210 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
DXOMark (camera) — 157
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 20 MP 12 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 157.5×75.3×8.0 mm 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm
Weight 199 g 214 g
Launch price $529 $1299

Camera comparison

Poco F8 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
70
camera

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Poco F8 Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Battery and charging

Poco F8 Pro

  • 6210 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:55 hrs, total 30:03 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco F8 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco F8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
79/100
3024818 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +12.7%
3463142 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Poco F8 Pro by 12.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco F8 Pro

$529

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

$1299

Launch price difference: $770. Poco F8 Pro was $770 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco F8 Pro (86/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Pro is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco F8 Pro is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco F8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra edges out the Poco F8 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Poco F8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco F8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco F8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 91/100).

Should you choose the Poco F8 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Poco F8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.