Poco F9 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco F9 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $699 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Pro leads — 84/100 vs 69/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F9 Pro has the bigger battery (6330 mAh vs 5600); the Poco F9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,228,426 vs 2,926,532); the Poco F9 Pro is noticeably lighter (206g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F9 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Poco F9 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3228426 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6330 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 206g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $2899
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (74/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (47/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F9 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Poco F9 Pro scores 15 points higher (84/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro leads (84/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Poco F9 Pro — 82/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (47/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F9 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3228426 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1156x2510 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6330 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×75.3×8.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 206 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $699 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Poco F9 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Poco F9 Pro
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1156x2510
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F9 Pro
- 6330 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F9 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F9 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 10.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2200. Poco F9 Pro was $2200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (74/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F9 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (47/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F9 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Poco F9 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F9 Pro leads on camera score (74/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F9 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F9 Pro leads on performance (95/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Poco F9 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.