Poco F8 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco F8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $729 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 69/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5600); the Poco F8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,651,476 vs 2,926,532); the Poco F8 Ultra is noticeably lighter (218g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F8 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Poco F8 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3651476 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 218g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $729 vs $2899
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (90/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (49/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F8 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Poco F8 Ultra scores 20 points higher (89/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Poco F8 Ultra — 92/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (49/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F8 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3651476 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 218 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $729 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Poco F8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Poco F8 Ultra
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F8 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 15:14 hrs, total 32:38 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F8 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F8 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 24.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2170. Poco F8 Ultra was $2170 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F8 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (49/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F8 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 20 points (89/100 vs 69/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F8 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F8 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F8 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Poco F8 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.