Poco F8 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26

The Poco F8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $729 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 74/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco F8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,651,476 vs 2,827,538); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 218g).

The Poco F8 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco F8 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 90
Camera 90
Battery 85
Portability 49
Value for money 92

Samsung Galaxy S26

Performance 89
Display 81
Camera 77
Battery 31
Portability 89
Value for money 62

What makes Poco F8 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3651476 vs 2827538
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2880
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9100
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $729 vs $799

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 77/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 81/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?

  • Lighter: 162g vs 218g

  • Better portability (89/100 vs 49/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco F8 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S26, the Poco F8 Ultra scores 15 points higher (89/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Poco F8 Ultra — 92/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (85/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Poco F8 Ultra (89/100 vs 49/100).

Poco F8 Ultra: The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy S26: The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco F8 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S26
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 3651476 2827538
Geekbench Single 3639 2880
Geekbench Multi 11047 9100
Display 6.7" LTPO AMOLED 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 3200x1440 2340x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 4000 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
DXOMark (camera) — 146
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 10 MP
Front camera 32 MP 12 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm
Weight 218 g 162 g
Launch price $729 $799

Camera comparison

Poco F8 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
77
camera

Display comparison

Poco F8 Ultra

  • 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Poco F8 Ultra

  • 6500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 15:14 hrs, total 32:38 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
85
battery

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
31
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco F8 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
3651476 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600
74/100 -29.1%
2827538 AnTuTu

Poco F8 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S26 by 29.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco F8 Ultra

$729

Samsung Galaxy S26

$799

Launch price difference: $70. Poco F8 Ultra was $70 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 89/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 77/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (85/100 vs 31/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Poco F8 Ultra (89/100 vs 49/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco F8 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Poco F8 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Poco F8 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Poco F8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 — 74/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco F8 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Poco F8 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 77/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco F8 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Poco F8 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 89/100).

Should you choose the Poco F8 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S26?

The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.