OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Poco F8 Ultra
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Poco F8 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $661 and $729. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 87/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the Poco F8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,651,476 vs 3,032,039).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Poco F8 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Lighter: 205g vs 218g
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $729
- Better camera (94/100 vs 90/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Poco F8 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3651476 vs 3032039
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 8932
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 90/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 83/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Poco F8 Ultra, the Poco F8 Ultra scores 2 points higher (89/100 vs 87/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Poco F8 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Poco F8 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Poco F8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 3651476 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 163.3×77.8×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $729 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F8 Ultra
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Poco F8 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 15:14 hrs, total 32:38 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Poco F8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F8 Ultra leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 17.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $68. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $68 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F8 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Poco F8 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 90/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 Ultra and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Poco F8 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Poco F8 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Poco F8 Ultra — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Poco F8 Ultra?
The Poco F8 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Poco F8 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Poco F8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.