OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Poco F7

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; launch prices were $661 and $399. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 66/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 2,199,079).

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 by 21 points (87/100 vs 66/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

Performance 90
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 59
Value for money 88

Poco F7

Performance 80
Display 83
Camera 37
Battery 68
Portability 48
Value for money 60

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 2199079
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 2072
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 6649
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 205g vs 215g

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Poco F7 better?

  • Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
  • Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $661

  • Overall rating 66/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Poco F7, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 21 points higher (87/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (90/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 68/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Poco F7 — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (94/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Poco F7 (83/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 48/100).

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China): The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Poco F7: The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) Poco F7
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
AnTuTu 3032039 2199079
Geekbench Single 2725 2072
Geekbench Multi 8932 6649
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1272 2712x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 80W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm
Weight 205 g 215 g
Launch price $661 $399

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Poco F7

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Poco F7

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Poco F7

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Poco F7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
87/100
3032039 AnTuTu
Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
66/100 -37.9%
2199079 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Poco F7 by 37.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

$661

Poco F7

$399

Launch price difference: $262. Poco F7 was $262 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Poco F7 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (94/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Poco F7 (83/100 vs 68/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Poco F7?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 by 21 points (87/100 vs 66/100).

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Poco F7?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Poco F7 — 66/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Poco F7?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Poco F7?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on performance (90/100 vs 80/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Poco F7?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.