OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Poco F7 Pro
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $661 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 80/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 2,301,212); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 220g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Poco F7 Pro
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 2301212
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 205g vs 220g
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 87/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 8932
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $661
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 83/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Poco F7 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 7 points higher (87/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 67/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Poco F7 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (90/100 vs 87/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (87/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Poco F7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 2301212 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 220 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $499 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Poco F7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads Poco F7 Pro by 31.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $162. Poco F7 Pro was $162 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Poco F7 Pro are nearly equal (90/100 vs 87/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (94/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (87/100 vs 83/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Poco F7 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Poco F7 Pro by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Poco F7 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Poco F7 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Poco F7 Pro?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.