OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Poco F9 Pro

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Poco F9 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $661 and $699. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 84/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6330); the Poco F9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,228,426 vs 3,032,039); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is thinner (7.7mm vs 8.8mm).

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Poco F9 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

Performance 90
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 59
Value for money 88

Poco F9 Pro

Performance 95
Display 91
Camera 74
Battery 84
Portability 47
Value for money 82

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?

  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6330 mAh
  • Lighter: 205g vs 206g
  • Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $699

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 74/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 47/100)

What makes Poco F9 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3228426 vs 3032039
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2725
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 8932
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 90/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better display (91/100 vs 84/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Poco F9 Pro, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 3 points higher (87/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 74/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Poco F9 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Poco F9 Pro (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 47/100).

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China): The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Poco F9 Pro: The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) Poco F9 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3032039 3228426
Geekbench Single 2725 3639
Geekbench Multi 8932 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1272 1156x2510
Refresh rate 120 Hz 185 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 6330 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 50W
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm 157.5×75.3×8.8 mm
Weight 205 g 206 g
Launch price $661 $699

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Poco F9 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
74
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Poco F9 Pro

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1156x2510
  • Refresh rate: 185 Hz
91
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Poco F9 Pro

  • 6330 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Poco F9 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
87/100
3032039 AnTuTu
Poco F9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +6.1%
3228426 AnTuTu

Poco F9 Pro leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 6.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)

$661

Poco F9 Pro

$699

Launch price difference: $38. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $38 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Poco F9 Pro (94/100 vs 74/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (59/100 vs 47/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Poco F9 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) edges out the Poco F9 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Poco F9 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Poco F9 Pro — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Poco F9 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 74/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Poco F9 Pro?

The Poco F9 Pro leads on performance (95/100 vs 90/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Poco F9 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Poco F9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.