Poco C65 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 71/100 vs 33/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C65 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 346,495); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.9mm vs 8.1mm).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 38 points (71/100 vs 33/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C65
Performance 25
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 63
Value for money 50
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Performance 92
Display 81
Camera 50
Battery 45
Portability 76
Value for money
What makes Poco C65 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
  • Lighter: 192g vs 199g

  • Overall rating 33/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 346495
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 375
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1031
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better camera (50/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (45/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (76/100 vs 63/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 38 points higher (71/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (92/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (92/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Poco C65 (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (76/100 vs 63/100).

Poco C65: The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco C65 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Processor MediaTek Helio G85 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 346495 3119308
Geekbench Single 375 3041
Geekbench Multi 1031 9494
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
Resolution 1600x720 1828x2584
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 18W 45W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 10 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 / HyperOS Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm
Weight 192 g 199 g
Launch price $99
Camera comparison
Poco C65
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera
Display comparison
Poco C65
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1828x2584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Poco C65
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco C65 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C65 MediaTek Helio G85
33/100
346495 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 +88.9%
3119308 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Poco C65 by 88.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco C65
$99
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (92/100 vs 25/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (81/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Poco C65 (50/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (76/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 38 points (71/100 vs 33/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (92/100 vs 25/100).

Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.