Poco C65 vs Samsung Galaxy S26+

The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $99 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads — 70/100 vs 33/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C65 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4900); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 346,495).

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 37 points (70/100 vs 33/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C65
Performance 25
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 63
Value for money 50
Samsung Galaxy S26+
Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 40
Battery 54
Portability 72
Value for money 52
What makes Poco C65 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4900 mAh
  • Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $999

  • Overall rating 33/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 346495
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 375
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9200 vs 1031
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Lighter: 190g vs 192g

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better camera (40/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (54/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (72/100 vs 63/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C65 vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ scores 37 points higher (70/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (91/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (40/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads (54/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Poco C65 — 50/100, Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 52/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (91/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (40/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (72/100 vs 63/100).

Poco C65: The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy S26+: The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco C65 Samsung Galaxy S26+
Processor MediaTek Helio G85 Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 346495 3161830
Geekbench Single 375 2900
Geekbench Multi 1031 9200
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1600x720 3120x1440
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4900 mAh
Charging 18W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 8 MP 12 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 13 / HyperOS Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm
Weight 192 g 190 g
Launch price $99 $999
Camera comparison
Poco C65
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera
Display comparison
Poco C65
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Poco C65
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • 4900 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
54
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco C65 and Samsung Galaxy S26+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C65 MediaTek Helio G85
33/100
346495 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600
70/100 +89.0%
3161830 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Poco C65 by 89.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco C65
$99
Samsung Galaxy S26+
$999

Launch price difference: $900. Poco C65 was $900 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (91/100 vs 25/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (89/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (40/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (54/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (72/100 vs 63/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 37 points (70/100 vs 33/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on camera score (40/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on performance (91/100 vs 25/100).

Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.