Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $999 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads — 82/100 vs 70/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4900); the Xiaomi 17T Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,207,005 vs 3,161,830); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is noticeably lighter (190g vs 205g).

The Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26+
Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 40
Battery 54
Portability 72
Value for money 52
Xiaomi 17T Pro
Performance 93
Display 94
Camera 63
Battery 87
Portability 54
Value for money 76
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 205g

  • Better portability (72/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17T Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3207005 vs 3161830
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2900
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9200
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $999

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (63/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better value for money (76/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Xiaomi 17T Pro scores 12 points higher (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (63/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (87/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (76/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (63/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (87/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (72/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (76/100 vs 52/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26+: The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi 17T Pro: The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S26+ Xiaomi 17T Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 2600 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3161830 3207005
Geekbench Single 2900 3228
Geekbench Multi 9200 9553
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 2772x1280
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4900 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm
Weight 190 g 205 g
Launch price $999 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera
Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
63
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26+
  • 4900 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
54
battery
Xiaomi 17T Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26+ and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600
70/100
3161830 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +1.4%
3207005 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17T Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S26+ by 1.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy S26+
$999
Xiaomi 17T Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $100. Xiaomi 17T Pro was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (63/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (87/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T Pro (72/100 vs 54/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (76/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 40/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26+ over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.