Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Xiaomi 17T Pro

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1999 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads — 82/100 vs 75/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17T Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,182,664 vs 3,065,623).

The Xiaomi 17T Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 58

Xiaomi 17T Pro

Performance 93
Display 94
Camera 63
Battery 87
Portability 54
Value for money 76

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (76/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 54/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17T Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3182664 vs 3065623
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2910
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 9174
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 205g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $1999

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 91/100)
  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Xiaomi 17T Pro scores 7 points higher (82/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (87/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100, Xiaomi 17T Pro — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (76/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (87/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi 17T Pro: The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Xiaomi 17T Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3065623 3182664
Geekbench Single 2910 3293
Geekbench Multi 9174 10243
Display 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2184x1968 2772x1280
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 145 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm —
Weight 215 g 205 g
Launch price $1999 $899

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera

Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
63
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1280
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Xiaomi 17T Pro

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100
3065623 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17T Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +3.7%
3182664 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17T Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by 3.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

$1999

Xiaomi 17T Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $1100. Xiaomi 17T Pro was $1100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (76/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (87/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Xiaomi 17T Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 63/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.