Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy S26+

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $1499 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 70/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4900); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 3,161,126).

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26+ by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

Performance 92
Display 95
Camera 60
Battery 64
Portability 68
Value for money 66

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Performance 91
Display 89
Camera 40
Battery 54
Portability 72
Value for money 50

What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 3161126
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2900
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 9200
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4900 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (60/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 89/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 199g
  • Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1499

  • Better portability (72/100 vs 68/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 8 points higher (78/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (60/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy S26+: The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Samsung Galaxy S26+
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 3379591 3161126
Geekbench Single 3013 2900
Geekbench Multi 9287 9200
Display 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1224x2992 3120x1440
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4900 mAh
Charging 68W 45W
Wireless charging 30W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 50 MP 12 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm
Weight 199 g 190 g
Launch price $1499 $999

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
95
display

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
64
battery

Samsung Galaxy S26+

  • 4900 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
54
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy S26+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
78/100
3379591 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26+ Samsung Exynos 2600
70/100 -6.9%
3161126 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy S26+ by 6.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

$1499

Samsung Galaxy S26+

$999

Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S26+ was $500 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (60/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26+ by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 40/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.