Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy S26+

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Motorola Razr Fold Motorola Signature Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Motorola Edge 70 Max Motorola Edge 70 Ultra Motorola Edge 70 Pro+

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Samsung Exynos 2600

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $1499 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 70/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4900); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 3,161,830).

The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26+ by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026

Performance 93

Display 95

Camera 60

Battery 64

Portability 68

Value for money 62

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Performance 91

Display 89

Camera 40

Battery 54

Portability 72

Value for money 52

What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?

Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 3161830
Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2900
Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 9200
Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4900 mAh
Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W

Higher performance (93/100 vs 91/100)
Better camera (60/100 vs 40/100)
Longer battery life (64/100 vs 54/100)
Better display (95/100 vs 89/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?

Lighter: 190g vs 199g
Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1499

Better portability (72/100 vs 68/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 8 points higher (78/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 52/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (60/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).

Motorola Razr Ultra 2026: The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Samsung Galaxy S26+: The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification	Motorola Razr Ultra 2026	Samsung Galaxy S26+
Processor	Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite	Samsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu	3379591	3161830
Geekbench Single	3041	2900
Geekbench Multi	9494	9200
Display	7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED	6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution	1224x2992	3120x1440
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Battery	5000 mAh	4900 mAh
Charging	68W	45W
Wireless charging	30W	15W
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Ultrawide	50 MP	12 MP
Telephoto	0 MP	10 MP
Front camera	50 MP	12 MP
RAM	16GB	12GB
Storage	512GB	256GB / 512GB
OS	Android 16	Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak)	5000 nits	2600 nits
NFC	yes	yes
Protection	IP48	IP68
Dimensions	171.5×74.0×7.2 mm	158.4×75.8×7.3 mm
Weight	199 g	190 g
Launch price	$1499	$999