Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1499 and $1999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 75/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 3,065,623); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 3065623
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2910
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 9174
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $1499 vs $1999
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (76/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 3 points higher (78/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (95/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (76/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (64/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 3065623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 2910 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9174 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2184x1968 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 145 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $1999 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by 10.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $500. Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 was $500 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (95/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (76/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (64/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.