Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy S25+
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1499 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 71/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4900); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 3,219,688).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy S25+
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 3219688
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4900 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Better camera (60/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 89/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25+ better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9700 vs 9287
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1499
- Better portability (72/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy S25+, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 7 points higher (78/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy S25+ — 52/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (60/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 3219688 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9700 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy S25+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy S25+ by 5.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S25+ was $500 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (60/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Samsung Galaxy S25+ by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.