Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25+
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1099 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 71/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S25+ has the bigger battery (4900 mAh vs 4700); the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,219,688 vs 2,962,094).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25+
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Better camera (57/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3219688 vs 2962094
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9700 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 4900 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1099
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S25+, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 5 points higher (76/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 40/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy S25+ — 52/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (57/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+ are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 3219688 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9700 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S25+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 8.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Samsung Galaxy S25+ was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (57/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+ are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy S25+ by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.