Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1099 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 76/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 3,113,462); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 214g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Faster charging: 68W vs 60W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 25W
- Lighter: 199g vs 214g
- Cheaper: $1099 vs $1299
- Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 51/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 3113462
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 92/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 58/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 8 points higher (84/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (76/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (61/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (68/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (76/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 3515964 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 10686 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 157 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 214 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 11.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $200. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is cheaper by $200.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (96/100 vs 92/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (61/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (68/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (76/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.