Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1099 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 73/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,515,964); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 214g).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3515964
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3601
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 10686
- Faster charging: 68W vs 60W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 214g
- Cheaper: $1099 vs $1299
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 84/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 32/100)
- Better value for money (34/100 vs 20/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Better camera (86/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 2 points higher (75/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (34/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (86/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100. In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (51/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (34/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 3515964 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 10686 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 157 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 214 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra by 12.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $200. Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is cheaper by $200.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (86/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (51/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (34/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra edges out the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 84/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.