Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 66/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,800,202); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 218g).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2800202
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9760
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 218g
- Cheaper: $1099 vs $1299
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 45/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 27/100)
- Better value for money (34/100 vs 20/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 7 points higher (73/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (34/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (51/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (34/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 2800202 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9760 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 151 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 218 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by 40.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $200. Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is cheaper by $200.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (92/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (51/100 vs 27/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (34/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.