Motorola Signature vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $699 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 86/100 vs 66/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,800,202); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Signature has the stronger camera (164 vs 151); the Motorola Signature is noticeably lighter (186g vs 218g).
Motorola Signature
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2800202
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9760
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 186g vs 218g
- Cheaper: $699 vs $1299
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 67/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 45/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (67/100 vs 27/100)
- Better value for money (62/100 vs 20/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 66/100
Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Motorola Signature scores 20 points higher (86/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature leads (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (68/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature leads (62/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (68/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (67/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (62/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 2800202 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9760 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 151 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 218 g | |
| Price | $699 | $1299 |
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Signature and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by 40.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $600. Motorola Signature is cheaper by $600.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (92/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (68/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (67/100 vs 27/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (62/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by 20 points (86/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (92/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.