Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1799 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 66/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,800,202); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 151); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably lighter (218g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2800202
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9760
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 67/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 45/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 218g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $1299 vs $1799
- Better design/ergonomics (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (20/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 11 points higher (77/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (92/100 vs 67/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (20/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 2800202 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9760 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 151 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 218 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by 40.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is cheaper by $500.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (92/100 vs 67/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (27/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (20/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 81/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 67/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.