Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1799 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 79/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 2,780,751); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 151); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably lighter (218g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 2780751
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Better camera (91/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 9119
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 218g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $1299 vs $1799
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 4 points higher (83/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 2780751 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 9760 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 151 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $1299 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by 9.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra was $500 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.