Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S26+
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $1799 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 70/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4900); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,126 vs 3,057,215); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is noticeably lighter (190g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy S26+
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4900 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Better camera (91/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161126 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9200 vs 9119
- Lighter: 190g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1799
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 13 points higher (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (91/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (72/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy S26+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3161126 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 2900 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 9200 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $999 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy S26+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Motorola Razr Fold by 3.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $800. Samsung Galaxy S26+ was $800 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (91/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (72/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.