Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1799 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 75/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,515,964); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 157); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably lighter (214g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3515964
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3601
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 10686
- Faster charging: 68W vs 60W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 84/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 86/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Lighter: 214g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $1299 vs $1799
- Better design/ergonomics (32/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (20/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 2 points higher (77/100 vs 75/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100. In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (32/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (20/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 3515964 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 10686 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 157 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 214 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra by 12.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is cheaper by $500.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (92/100 vs 84/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (32/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (20/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 84/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.