Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1799 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 83/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,463,142 vs 3,057,215); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 157); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably lighter (214g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Faster charging: 68W vs 60W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 25W
- Better camera (91/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 61/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 51/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3463142 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 9119
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 214g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $1299 vs $1799
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 90/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 1 points higher (84/100 vs 83/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3463142 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 10686 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | 157 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 214 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $1299 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Motorola Razr Fold by 11.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra was $500 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (91/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra edges out the Motorola Razr Fold by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.