Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S26
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; estimated prices are $1799 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 54/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,856,499); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2856499
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 15/100)
- Lighter: 162g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $799 vs $1799
- Better design/ergonomics (97/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S26, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 23 points higher (77/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (51/100 vs 15/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (51/100 vs 15/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (97/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 2856499 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 2880 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9100 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 162 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $799 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy S26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy S26 by 38.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1000. Samsung Galaxy S26 is cheaper by $1000.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (92/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (91/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (51/100 vs 15/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (97/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 by 23 points (77/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for active users.