Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $1099 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 66/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 4000); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 2,856,499); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 199g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 2856499
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 9100
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
- Lighter: 162g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1099
- Better portability (89/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S26, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 10 points higher (76/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 — 44/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (57/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (58/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (89/100 vs 68/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 2856499 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 2880 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9100 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 162 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $799 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S26 by 9.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $300. Samsung Galaxy S26 was $300 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (57/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (58/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (89/100 vs 68/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26 — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.