Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1099 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 79/100 vs 76/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 2,800,202); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 218g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 2800202
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 218g
- Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1299
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 46/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 3 points higher (79/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 66/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (68/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 2800202 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9760 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 151 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $1299 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra by 11.2% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $200. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra was $200 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (68/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.