Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26+
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $1099 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 70/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ has the bigger battery (4900 mAh vs 4700); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 3,113,462).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 9200
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
- Better value for money (64/100 vs 52/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 3113462
- Bigger battery: 4900 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1099
- Better portability (72/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 6 points higher (76/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (57/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 3161830 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 2900 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9200 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $999 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S26+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 1.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $100. Samsung Galaxy S26+ was $100 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (57/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+ are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26+ by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.