Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26+
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $1099 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 70/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4900); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,161,830).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3161830
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2900
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9200
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4900 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 89/100)
- Better value for money (72/100 vs 52/100)
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1099
- Better portability (72/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S26+, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 10 points higher (80/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (60/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (98/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (60/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (72/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 3161830 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 2900 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9200 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $999 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S26+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S26+ by 24.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $100. Samsung Galaxy S26+ was $100 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (98/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (60/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (72/100 vs 68/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (72/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 70/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (60/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 91/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S26+?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.