Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; estimated prices are $1099 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 54/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,856,499); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 199g).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2856499
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (58/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 15/100)
- Lighter: 162g vs 199g
- Cheaper: $799 vs $1099
- Better design/ergonomics (97/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S26, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 19 points higher (73/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 15/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (55/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (58/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (51/100 vs 15/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (97/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (55/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 2856499 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 2880 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9100 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 162 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $799 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S26 by 38.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $300. Samsung Galaxy S26 is cheaper by $300.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (92/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (58/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (51/100 vs 15/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (97/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (55/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (58/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for active users.