OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600; launch prices were $600 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 74/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,827,538); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 188g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S26
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2827538
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $799
- Better camera (94/100 vs 77/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 2880 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9100 vs 6405
- Lighter: 162g vs 188g
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 82/100)
- Better portability (89/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy S26, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 9 points higher (83/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 31/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Samsung Galaxy S26 — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (94/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (66/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (89/100 vs 64/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 2827538 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 2880 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 9100 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 146 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 162 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $799 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy S26 by 8.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $199. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $199 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (94/100 vs 77/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 (66/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 Pro (89/100 vs 64/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 77/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on performance (89/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.